I have watched football for my entire life and would presumably say I have an undesirable fixation on the game and like all fans I have my own thoughts of how to further develop it. My primary bogeyman however is the linesman/arbitrators partner. In the first class in nations like England, Italy and Spain where cash is accessible for it for what reason do we just have two linesmen? Clearly it's a good idea to have four? Then, at that point, they can settle on better decisions on decisions on whether or not the ball went too far. Additionally it should improve the probability of an aggressor getting the opportunity to be vindicated in offside calls in case players are possibly given offside when the two linesmen raise their banners. Yet, the fundamental explanation I have for pushing for four linesmen is on the grounds that an official requirements their assistance. The four linesman could then get on shirt pulling, elbows and different goings on that happens away from the ref. What irritates me the most is the explicit body checks and shirt pulls that happen away from the ref to stop a player making a spat behind a protector. I do become ill of the media letting me know that seeing players shipped off ruins the game when to my psyche what ruins the game are the skeptical purported 'cunning' fouls that stop an assailant in full stream for almost no discipline. In addition I trust that if players got more brutal discipline for those kind of fouls they would be much less inclined to submit them in any case. I don't really accept that they would prompt more appointments and red cards generally, simply a bringing down of negative fouls. After all they said the prohibiting of the tackle from behind would prompt most games finishing with somewhere around one player being shipped off however as we have seen all that has happened is that the players have modified their game to make up for the standard changes. The other thing, is that a linesman will then, at that point, consistently be on the right half of the pitch - dissimilar to now where players can pull off removing corners from the quadrant and so on in light of the fact that the linesman is on the opposite side of the pitch. Like the twofold bet, it requires picking three groups rather than two in the twofold bet. Assuming this large number of groups win, that is if you bet for winning, that would make you win. วิธีเเทงบอล Aside from little adjustments like this however I for one feel football has no compelling reason to change. Absolutely I would prefer not to see the official losing the power he presently has as while it may diminish the potential for debasement it would likewise lose the arguments that the ref gives by making human blunders. Let's be honest we as a whole need to discuss the arbitrator not giving or giving a vital punishment, missing a foul and so forth which gives us a simple reason for our group losing rather than letting it be known wasn't adequate to beat the resistance. After everything who doesn't completely accept that that their group is the best group there is? We as a whole realize that at each level, the fans serenade that their group is the best the world has seen despite the fact that we realize it isn't accurate, we actually trust it. Having said that it would be an improvement if the match authorities, an agent of the two clubs that have quite recently played, and a free authority all plunked down after a match and went through the match video really looking at their choices. The club authorities could then question choices that the clubs couldn't help contradicting and review disciplines or respites could be given out by the match official.